“All of us at anxietycentre.com have experienced debilitating anxiety. But we’ve also overcome it and returned to normal and lasting health. Because we know the hardship anxiety unwellness can cause, we are committed to helping others, with over 30 years of service.” - Jim Folk, President, anxietycentre.com

Psychiatric Diagnoses Found To Be Scientifically Meaningless

Jim Folk author
Written by: Jim Folk.
Medically reviewed by: Marilyn Folk, BScN.
Last updated: July 11, 2019


Psychiatric Diagnoses Found To Be Scientifically Meaningless

A new study by University of Liverpool researchers has found that psychiatric diagnoses are scientifically worthless as tools to identify discrete mental health disorders. Their study involved a detailed analysis of five key chapters of the latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), on schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, and trauma-related disorders.

Among the many findings, researchers highlighted:

  • Theory and practice of diagnostic assessment is central yet contentious in psychiatry.
  • DSM-5 contains heterogeneous diagnostic categories.
  • Pragmatic criteria give clinical flexibility but undermine the diagnostic model.
  • Trauma has a limited causal role in DSM-5, despite research evidence to the contrary.
  • Psychiatric diagnoses all use different decision-making rules.
  • There is a huge amount of overlap in symptoms between diagnoses.
  • Almost all diagnoses mask the role of trauma and adverse events.
  • Diagnoses tell us little about the individual patient and what treatment they need.

The research concludes:

“A pragmatic approach to psychiatric assessment, allowing for recognition of individual experience, may therefore be a more effective way of understanding distress than maintaining commitment to a disingenuous categorical system.”

It’s not surprising that a study has found psychiatric diagnosis to be scientifically meaningless. What is surprising is that it was published in the Journal of Psychiatry Research.

While many in the mental health community have realized this, for psychiatry in general to acknowledge it, is really something. And it’s something that could benefit those who struggle with and treat mental illness.

We’ve also had issues with the medical model being imposed on mental health. That’s because, mental illness, for the most part, involves behavioral causes and not biological, chemical, or genetic causes, which the medical model adheres to. Saying that someone has anxiety or depression because of a “medical” problem pins the tail on the wrong donkey, in our experience.

Not only is a medical-sounding label unhelpful because symptoms and treatment options are so diverse, but it also causes unnecessary hardship for many who then live their lives according to their “label,” which often deprives them of the help they could benefit from.

I’m (Jim Folk) not the only one saying this.

Lead researcher Dr. Kate Allsopp, University of Liverpool, said: "Although diagnostic labels create the illusion of an explanation they are scientifically meaningless and can create stigma and prejudice. I hope these findings will encourage mental health professionals to think beyond diagnoses and consider other explanations of mental distress, such as trauma and other adverse life experiences."[2]

Professor Peter Kinderman, University of Liverpool, said: "This study provides yet more evidence that the biomedical diagnostic approach in psychiatry is not fit for purpose. Diagnoses frequently and uncritically reported as 'real illnesses' are in fact made on the basis of internally inconsistent, confused and contradictory patterns of largely arbitrary criteria. The diagnostic system wrongly assumes that all distress results from disorder, and relies heavily on subjective judgments about what is normal."[2]

Professor John Read, University of East London, said: "Perhaps it is time we stopped pretending that medical-sounding labels contribute anything to our understanding of the complex causes of human distress or of what kind of help we need when distressed."[2]

I hope the mental health community takes these findings seriously and moves in a direction that can truly help those who have mental health challenges. A new direction – one that correctly attributes the cause, such as trauma, early life experiences, learned unhealthy coping skills, environment, etc., and provides meaningful treatment – will also help eliminate the negative stigma associated with mental illness.

There’s a reason why therapy is the “Gold Standard” treatment for many common mental illnesses, including anxiety disorder and depression.[3][4][5][6] When the correct cause is identified and the resulting problems worked through, mental health problems resolve. The person can then go on to live a wonderful life free from mental illness and its adverse effects. That’s what this research is pointing out, so it’s welcome news!


The combination of good self-help information and working with an experienced anxiety disorder therapist is the most effective way to address anxiety disorder and its many symptoms. Until the core causes of anxiety are addressed - the underlying factors that motivate apprehensive behavior - a struggle with anxiety disorder can return again and again. Identifying and successfully addressing anxiety's underlying factors is the best way to overcome problematic anxiety.

Additional Resources:


Return to our Anxiety Research section.


REFERENCES:

1. Kate Allsopp et al, "Heterogeneity in psychiatric diagnostic classification." Psychiatry Research (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.07.005

2. Medical XPress. "Study finds psychiatric diagnosis to be 'scientifically meaningless'." Medical XPress, July 8, 2019.

3. Hofmann, Stefan G., et al. “The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-Analyses.” Cognitive Therapy and Research, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 1 Oct. 2012.

4. Leichsenring, Falk. “Is Cognitive Behavioral Therapy the Gold Standard for Psychotherapy?” JAMA, American Medical Association, 10 Oct. 2017.

5. Driessen, Ellen, et al. "Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Mood Disorders: Efficacy, Moderators and Mediators." Psychiatry Clinics of North America, Sep. 2010.

6. "CBT can be recommended as a gold standard in the psychotherapeutic treatment of patients with anxiety disorders." - Otte, Christian. "Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Anxiety Disorders: Current State of the Evidence." Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience. Les Laboratoires Servier, Dec. 2011. Web. 14 Sept. 2016.